A 65-year-old male patient. Presented with complaints of back pain at the level of the scapula and pain in the left thigh. The pain is dull, worsening over the last two months. During this time, he has also experienced progressive difficulties with urination and defecation due to the lack of urge and ability to strain. Every 4-5 days, he is forced to take laxatives or perform an enema. The patient also cannot feel or control urination, requiring a catheter with 4-hour intervals for urination.
All symptoms have been gradually worsening over two months. He cannot walk but can stand with support. Most pain-relieving medications do not provide complete relief.
Blood biochemistry and hematological profile - normal.
Chest X-ray: One large lesion extends beyond the left cardiac shadow, another is located in the left lateral middle lobe of the lung, presumably with metastases.
Ultrasound: No focal lesions in the liver, kidneys normal, prostate enlarged. CT scan of the head showed multiple large lesions in the brain's meninges.
MRI of the spinal cord: Altered bone marrow signal in the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions at multiple levels. There is a pathological compression fracture at the T3 vertebra, associated with a paravertebral mass extending from T1 to T5 and an epidural mass from T2 to T4, causing spinal compression.
At the S2 level, another large tumor is located in the middle and left side, narrowing the sacral spinal canal and likely affecting the nerve endings of the left sacral plexus.
These findings are primarily due to metastatic involvement.
Based on all symptoms, a diagnosis of lung cancer with metastases to the lungs, thoracic spine, sacrum, and brain meninges was made.
The patient was recommended radiotherapy, but he sought alternatives and, upon hearing about treatment with special IR radiation according to the Rahimov method, decided to try it. In his case, radiotherapy had not yet been performed. After being informed that the so-called RC emitter has the effect of recombination of radicals with high activation energy and, theoretically, could reduce or stop growth, with or without symptomatic relief, he wished to try the treatment. He was treated for 14 days, mainly using RC, GI, and ZB with brief exposure.
Results: The results were astonishing, with significant symptomatic relief. After 3 days, there was complete relief from sacral spine pain. The primary issue was pain in the left thigh, which diminished after 10 days and did not return. Bowel movements were restored after 7 days (once every two days) and then daily after a few more days. Urination also became independent, and the catheter was removed. He can walk short distances. Discharged from the hospital, recommended to continue treatment at home with 4 types of emitters (RC, GI, ZB, KL). Ten days later, the patient could walk with a cane and looked very happy. After another 2 weeks (3.5 weeks post-discharge), he arrived without a cane. Before treatment, he was prescribed a wheelchair. All symptomatic improvements were maintained for one month. He stopped treatment when he felt the emitter was no longer effective. A week later, his leg was paralyzed again, and sacral spine pain returned. He came for treatment and received RV emitter therapy. After one session, the pain significantly decreased and stayed at that level.
Comments: Theoretically, treatment might halt cancer growth. In some patients, symptomatic relief is expected when the body's immune system restores normal metabolic processes in the lesion site, especially after the ZB emitter, which aids in tumor resorption to a certain extent and improves blood circulation. The better the clinical condition and organ function, the more effective results we can expect because treatment, in these cases, can be conducted without interference. In patients who have not undergone radio- or chemotherapy, we expect better clinical outcomes. This therapy method can be used for symptomatic treatment of cancer patients.
All symptoms have been gradually worsening over two months. He cannot walk but can stand with support. Most pain-relieving medications do not provide complete relief.
Blood biochemistry and hematological profile - normal.
Chest X-ray: One large lesion extends beyond the left cardiac shadow, another is located in the left lateral middle lobe of the lung, presumably with metastases.
Ultrasound: No focal lesions in the liver, kidneys normal, prostate enlarged. CT scan of the head showed multiple large lesions in the brain's meninges.
MRI of the spinal cord: Altered bone marrow signal in the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions at multiple levels. There is a pathological compression fracture at the T3 vertebra, associated with a paravertebral mass extending from T1 to T5 and an epidural mass from T2 to T4, causing spinal compression.
At the S2 level, another large tumor is located in the middle and left side, narrowing the sacral spinal canal and likely affecting the nerve endings of the left sacral plexus.
These findings are primarily due to metastatic involvement.
Based on all symptoms, a diagnosis of lung cancer with metastases to the lungs, thoracic spine, sacrum, and brain meninges was made.
The patient was recommended radiotherapy, but he sought alternatives and, upon hearing about treatment with special IR radiation according to the Rahimov method, decided to try it. In his case, radiotherapy had not yet been performed. After being informed that the so-called RC emitter has the effect of recombination of radicals with high activation energy and, theoretically, could reduce or stop growth, with or without symptomatic relief, he wished to try the treatment. He was treated for 14 days, mainly using RC, GI, and ZB with brief exposure.
Results: The results were astonishing, with significant symptomatic relief. After 3 days, there was complete relief from sacral spine pain. The primary issue was pain in the left thigh, which diminished after 10 days and did not return. Bowel movements were restored after 7 days (once every two days) and then daily after a few more days. Urination also became independent, and the catheter was removed. He can walk short distances. Discharged from the hospital, recommended to continue treatment at home with 4 types of emitters (RC, GI, ZB, KL). Ten days later, the patient could walk with a cane and looked very happy. After another 2 weeks (3.5 weeks post-discharge), he arrived without a cane. Before treatment, he was prescribed a wheelchair. All symptomatic improvements were maintained for one month. He stopped treatment when he felt the emitter was no longer effective. A week later, his leg was paralyzed again, and sacral spine pain returned. He came for treatment and received RV emitter therapy. After one session, the pain significantly decreased and stayed at that level.
Comments: Theoretically, treatment might halt cancer growth. In some patients, symptomatic relief is expected when the body's immune system restores normal metabolic processes in the lesion site, especially after the ZB emitter, which aids in tumor resorption to a certain extent and improves blood circulation. The better the clinical condition and organ function, the more effective results we can expect because treatment, in these cases, can be conducted without interference. In patients who have not undergone radio- or chemotherapy, we expect better clinical outcomes. This therapy method can be used for symptomatic treatment of cancer patients.